But the end result looks so much better than anything I created with Finale, so I’m sold. I’m not sure that I’ll save time with the kinds of simple scores I create. My colleagues who’ve raved about Dorico have said they save a lot of time using it versus Finale or Sibelius. I’m sure it will take significantly less once I’m truly comfortable with Dorico’s layout.
I timed myself and it took 18 minutes from opening the program to emailing a pdf to our administrator. Does It Save Time?Ī couple days ago I made a score with a melody line + lyrics for a bulletin. Here’s one of the first scores I created with Dorico last fall, if you’re curious what it looks like. (It’s a simple layout-just takes time to remember where everything is, especially since I don’t make scores that often.) Each score has gotten exponentially easier to make as I’ve gotten used to the layout. The first hymn setting I did took several (kinda frustrating) hours, but I kept telling myself the frustration would probably be worth it.
It took about 10 hours for me to get comfortable making typical church scores-things like a short handbell arrangement, or a 4-part hymn setting to be used in a printed bulletin. And I didn’t use Finale for major compositional projects or large ensemble works.
#DORICO MUSIC SOFTWARE HOW TO#
However, I never learned how to finesse the scores to make them look professional. I felt very confident using Finale to make functional scores for small ensembles and solo work. The scores look much better than anything I ever created with Finale. The church didn’t own notation software already, so I decided to take the plunge and buy it instead of Finale. It’s a relatively new music notation software that my colleagues have been raving about.
Last year I bought Dorico for my church job.
0 kommentar(er)
